V3b / FROZEN INTERFEROMETRY TEST / 14 OCTOBER 2026

Cancel the path.
What information survives?

An exact common-path measurement identity seemed to promise remote access to a learned visual phase memory. The numerical identity holds; its ability to answer questions depends on what the stored endpoint actually encodes.

z₁z₂* = exp(i[τ(source) − τ(port)])

Both signals traverse the same 12-step sequence of grid positions, in opposite local operator order. The shared intermediate terms cancel in the conjugate product. The remaining phase is relative to the detector—not an absolute source phase.

Unchanged stored state64 bytesFrozen independent writers, seeds 41 and 97
Stationary physical ports2Two complex readings per endpoint ratio
Exact identity error≈ 10⁻⁶Computed on actual learned checkpoint maps

Measured classification results

Each checkpoint answers 2,048 held-out questions. Select the number of physical complex-valued sensor readings. The original and new heads use the same architecture, optimization schedule and question labels.

Bars show the mean across the two independent writer seeds, and the table below preserves their disagreement.

Loading recorded checkpoint measurements…

Accuracy by frozen writer

ReadoutSeed 41Seed 97Average
Loading JSON…

What the test actually says

Verified algebra. Different learned codes. No universal accuracy improvement.

The conjugate ratio cancels changes in shared intermediate phase values while preserving the difference between source and detector phase. The tests verify that invariant even under deliberately altered intermediate cells.

But direct access to the same single source location is also highly seed-dependent: at two measurements, the equivalent direct-source sample scores 62.74% for seed 41 and 99.95% for seed 97. Seed 41 simply has much less label information in that particular source site. A fixed endpoint reference also varies across scenes, so a relative phase is not a direct-source reading without calibration.

Keeping both uncombined measurements can outperform the ratio because their common phase includes other task-relevant learned features. Cancellation removes those features, whether they are clutter or useful signal.

The difference between the four comparisons

ReadoutWhat it seesHow many source locations at K readings?
Raw paired ordersBoth complex 12-step responsesK/2
Uncorrected subtractionz₁ − z₂; retains common-path rotationK/2
Conjugate ratioz₁ × conj(z₂); cancels common pathK/2
Demodulated subtraction(z₁ − z₂) × conj(z₂) = ratio − 1K/2
Direct matched sourcesPhase at exactly the source sites paired waves useK/2 (privileged addressable access)
Direct local phasePhase at K source locationsK (privileged addressable access)

Reader input dimensions are padded equally where needed. Padding is not an extra measurement. Two paired phase waves traverse the same path but spend two physical shots for one source. Their intermediate cells may carry the label; direct controls have privileged memory access. Equal output measurements do not imply equal computational cost.

Evidence and reproducibility

Actual v3b seed41.json · Actual v3b seed97.json · Frozen protocol · Phase probe code · Training/evaluation script

The input images are synthetic static four-mark scenes. These experiments show relative-phase signal processing in an ideal unitary grid with externally chosen routes. They do not demonstrate neural dendritic transport, physical myelin delay control, holographic reconstruction, or a new mathematical theorem.